David Moss talks Non-Resident lending with Straits Times
Singaporeans looking to buy homes in the popular market of Australia may face more hurdles after major Australian banks tightened lending criteria to non-residents in recent months.
The Commonwealth Bank said it will no longer approve applications that cite self-employed foreign currency income. “The Commonwealth Bank has tightened requirements for some temporary residents in the areas of self-employed applicants and temporary visas who are seeking to borrow for residential purposes,” a bank spokesman told The Straits Times.
The lender will also reject foreign-currency income of temporary Australian residents, and temporary Australian residents with Australian-dollar incomes can now borrow only up to 70 per cent of the value of the property, down from 80 per cent previously.
Another major bank, the National Australia Bank (NAB), has cut the maximum loan-to-value ratio from 80 per cent to 60 per cent for non-resident home loan applicants. It will also take a “shading” – or a discount – of up to 40 per cent on the applicant’s income when assessing the borrower’s ability to service the loan.
Mr Andrew McCasker, NAB head of property financing for South and South-east Asia, said: “NAB, through our Singapore office, is still supporting borrowings for Singaporean residents who are looking at investing in the Australian and New Zealand market.”
However, analysts say investors should note that loans originating from Singapore will be subject to the total debt servicing ratio (TDSR) framework.
Despite the more stringent lending rules, mortgage brokers and property agents do not think Singapore investors will be badly hit.
“Singaporeans, in general, are still viewed rather favourably as they are able to produce income or bank statements from reliable sources,” said PropNex International head of international markets Anson Tay.
Australian mortgage advisor David and Partners, which counts Singaporean investors as a big portion of its clientele, said there are still avenues to obtain home financing.
Said its managing director David Moss: “We have 20 lenders in Australia on our panel, and they are still lending… Probably the biggest change is not so much that they are not lending, it is the additional documentation required for loans.”
Reapfield Property Consultants, which focuses on marketing Australian property, said some investors have turned to creative options. “Some clients will take advantage of the lower interest rate here by borrowing against their property in Singapore, provided they are not affected by TDSR. They then take the cash to fully pay for the Australian property,” noted Reapfield Property Consultants executive director Peter Thng.
The firm has marketed various landed home projects in Melbourne, including Manor Lakes, Jubilee and Bridgefield estates.
Mr Thng said local investors are more concerned about the additional stamp duty surcharges on foreign property buyers in Australia.
From last Tuesday, foreigners buying homes in New South Wales have been required to pay a new 4 per cent stamp duty surcharge, making it the second state in Australia to impose such a duty.
In the state of Victoria, the additional levy – currently 3 per cent but set to rise to 7 per cent from July 1 – was implemented on foreign property purchases last year.
In Queensland, with Brisbane as its state capital, the state government is planning a new 3 per cent foreign property surcharge, expected to kick in this October.
Australian government data showed that Chinese investment in Australian real estate doubled to A$24 billion (S$24.3 billion) last year, from A$12 billion in 2014.
China was the top property investor, followed by the United States with A$7.1 billion, Singapore with A$3.8 billion and Malaysia with A$3.4 billion. Large Singapore companies have invested in the property market in Australia.
Trackback from your site.